The Big Idea

Nike's Old Guard Returns

In the fast-paced world of sportswear and athletic fashion, even giants can stumble. Nike, the undisputed titan, has recently found itself navigating a period of uncharacteristic turbulence, marked by declining sales and a sense that the brand had drifted from its core identity. However, in a decisive move to recalibrate and reignite its dominance, Nike is turning to a familiar playbook and, crucially, a team of seasoned veterans to execute it. The strategy is clear: a return to the fundamentals that once made Nike invincible, spearheaded by leaders who know the company's DNA inside and out.

The Recent Slip: A Titan Stumbles

Recent financial reports have painted a picture of Nike facing significant headwinds. For its fiscal 2025 third quarter, which concluded on February 28, 2025, the company reported revenues of $11.3 billion, a 9% decrease on a reported basis compared to the prior year. This followed a similar trend in the second quarter of fiscal 2025, where revenues were $12.4 billion, down 8% year-over-year (NIKE, Inc. - Investor Relations). The company even forecast a steeper drop in fourth-quarter revenue than analysts anticipated, signaling ongoing challenges (Reuters).

This downturn isn't just about numbers; it reflects deeper issues. Analysts and industry observers point to several factors: a perceived lack of "newness" and innovation in Nike's product lines (Investopedia), increased competition from agile and trend-focused rivals like On and Hoka, and challenges in key markets like China due to "persistent macroeconomic headwinds". Furthermore, a previous heavy focus on direct-to-consumer sales strained relationships with vital wholesale partners and, some argue, diluted the brand's core sports-driven identity, leading to high inventories and excessive discounting (Reuters).

The "Return to Basics" Strategy

In response to these challenges, Nike is embarking on a significant strategic shift, aptly described as a "return to basics." This isn't about reinventing the wheel but rather re-centering the brand on its foundational pillars. At the heart of this strategy is a renewed and intense focus on the sports that are core to Nike's heritage, such as basketball and running (Reuters). The aim is to recapture the "obsession with sport" that historically defined the brand.

This involves a multi-pronged approach:

• Product Innovation: Acknowledging the criticism about a lack of newness, Nike is doubling down on creating innovative and exciting products that resonate with athletes and consumers alike.

• Rebuilding Wholesale Partnerships: The company is actively working to mend and strengthen relationships with key retailers, recognizing their importance in reaching consumers and showcasing the brand effectively. Foot Locker CEO Mary Dillon has noted positive engagement with Nike's new leadership in this regard.

• Full-Price Sales Focus: A shift away from heavy discounting towards selling more products at full price, particularly through its digital channels, aims to restore brand value and improve profit margins.

• Authentic Sports Marketing: Nike plans to reallocate marketing funds from purely digital ads to more "anthemic sports campaigns" that celebrate athletic achievement and reinforce its sporting credentials (ET BrandEquity).

The Veteran Team

Executing this "back to basics" strategy requires leaders who not only understand Nike's past but also possess the experience to navigate its future. This is where the "Old Guard" comes into play. The most significant move was the return of Elliott Hill, a long-time Nike veteran, as President and CEO in October 2024 (NIKE, Inc.). Hill's appointment was seen as a clear signal of the company's intent to refocus and stabilize. In his first public address as CEO, he candidly stated that Nike had "lost its obsession with sport" and vowed to put it back on track.

Hill isn't alone in this endeavor. Recent leadership shuffles have seen other seasoned Nike insiders stepping into critical roles. As reported by Adweek in May 2025, Tom Clarke, a 45-year Nike veteran, assumed a new role as a strategic advisor to Hill (Adweek). Additionally, Phil McCartney, a 27-year Nike veteran, is now overseeing product creation, a crucial area for the brand's resurgence. Another 20-year veteran, Montagne, was also part of this leadership elevation. While specific dates for all appointments vary, the trend is clear: leveraging deep institutional knowledge to drive the turnaround.

Restructuring and Righting the Ship

Alongside leadership changes and strategic refocusing, Nike is also undertaking necessary restructuring. In May 2025, the company confirmed layoffs within its technology division as part of a broader effort to realign strategic priorities. Some of this work is being shifted to third-party vendors (FashionNetwork Canada). These moves, while difficult, are indicative of a company streamlining operations to support its core mission.

The path to recovery is acknowledged to be a multi-year process. However, the combination of a clear "back to basics" strategy, the leadership of experienced Nike veterans, and decisive restructuring efforts provides a roadmap for "righting the ship." The focus is on clearing out stale inventory, invigorating product lines with true innovation, and reconnecting with consumers through an authentic celebration of sport.

Looking Ahead: The Marathon Continues

Nike's current journey is less of a sprint and more of a marathon, a fitting analogy for a brand built on athletic endurance. The return of its "Old Guard" signals a commitment to leveraging its rich heritage and deep-seated expertise to overcome recent stumbles. By going back to the fundamentals that once propelled it to global dominance, unparalleled product innovation, a deep connection to athletes, and an unwavering focus on sport, Nike aims to prove that its best days are still ahead. The sports business world will be watching closely as these veterans lace up to lead Nike into its next chapter.

Marketing

Behavioral Fanonomics

Behavioral economics speaks to how our inherent human instincts affect economic decisions. They play a large part in how people evaluate purchase decisions involving sports..

Behavioral economics explores how our hard-wired human cognitive biases influence our decisions, often leading to outcomes that differ from rationality and logic. Understanding key principles of behavioral economics can help teams understand fans’ purchase behavior when it comes to sports.

Principle: Anchoring

When people don’t know the value of things, they tend to assign a value based on the first reference they get. Studies have shown people change their estimate of an object’s value by simply hearing a different random number beforehand. For sports tickets, that anchor is face value. Teams should be aware that dynamic pricing will create a negative impression if it exceeds the face value. That negative reaction can be minimized if buyers are given a reason for the pricing difference, in effect “re-anchoring” their expectations. On the flipside, a bundle can create a positive effect when the savings from face value are clear.

Principle: Scarcity

We tend to value things more if they seem rare. It plays into our FOMO. That’s why keeping gameday promotions to limited editions enhances the perceived value, whether it be a t-shirt, a bobblehead, or a key chain. By the same token, repeating a promotional offer signals that the item is plentiful and therefore of less value. Limited purchase windows have the same effect for both tickets and merchandise.

Principle: Reciprocity

We are social animals, and we can’t help but feel connected and obligated to someone who has done us a solid. If you want a season-ticket holder to renew or upgrade,  consider giving something that signals special treatment: a used hand towel, a piece of old court, or a game puck. If it’s given as a gift, without framing it as a reward for another transaction, it can foster a sense of reciprocity. 

Principle: Social Proof

We tend to look to others for validation to justify our behavior for good and bad. Let your best fans be a model for your other fans. Showcasing hockey fans wearing their team sweaters at the game reinforces that team gear is the apparel of choice for true fans. Reinforce the behaviors you’d like your fans to follow by showing them how others are doing it. One of the most common ways you see teams utilize this tactic in-stadium is through Jumbotron cameras highlighting fans that are going wild and cheering.

Principle: Loss Aversion

In general, people hate losing more than they love winning. People will pay more to insure against losing $100 than they are willing to pay at a chance of winning $100. In that context, “have a great time with the family” may be less effective in getting people to a game than “don’t miss out on a lifetime memory.” This principle explains why the NFL's "Last Chance to Secure Playoff Tickets" campaigns drive more urgency than generic promotions, or why the Golden State Warriors saw a 22% spike in single-game sales when they framed a regular-season matchup as "Your Final Opportunity to See the Historic Curry-Thompson Duo." Teams also leverage loss aversion in merchandise, with limited-edition "retirement tour" jerseys (like Derek Jeter's 2014 farewell) consistently outselling standard versions by creating artificial scarcity.

Principle: Peak-End Rule

We tend to remember an experience based on how we feel at its latest emotional peak. That’s why a walk-off win seals such a special place in our memory regardless of what came before it. But most game operations put all their emphasis on the beginning of the game (national anthems, dramatic team intros, player tributes, etc.) But there’s usually not much happening around the game after halftime or intermission. Putting some attention on late-game or post-game rituals can help seal a more positive fan experience. European soccer clubs like Liverpool FC have perfected post-match rituals, keeping fans engaged with player walk-arounds and communal singing of "You'll Never Walk Alone" long after the final whistle. These deliberate late-game experiences help cement positive memories that keep fans coming back.

Principle: Decision Paralysis/Cognitive Overload

When faced with too many choices, we tend to default to the simplest option. In some cases, the simplest thing is to avoid a decision altogether. While it’s tempting to construct a lot of different sales packages to appeal to different fan types, too many deals can have the opposite of the intended effect, resulting in less sales instead of more. 

Behavioral economics is a fascinating subject. If you want to learn more about it, Thinking, Fast and Slow by Nobel-prize winner Daniel Kahneman is the definite intellectual guide, while Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion by Robert Cialdini is the highly-regarded practical overview.

By The Numbers

Numbers That Jumped Off the Page

7- For the first time in NBA league history, a 7th team will win the NBA Finals for the 7th year in a row. Parity is finally hitting the NBA, and it only took the league 78 years to figure out!

1,000- This coming weekend, roughly 1 in 1,000 people in the US will be in attendance for the Indianapolis 500, with the crowd being anywhere from 350,000 to 400,000 spectators. Nowhere can that be felt more than in the traffic to and from the event.

2.7 million- The WNBA matchup between the Indiana Fever and the Chicago Sky this past week averaged 2.7 million viewers, with a peak of 3.1 million, marking the biggest TV turnout for a WNBA game in a quarter-century. It seems even heading into Year 2, the Caitlin Clark Effect remains one of the top draws for the sport.

Pulse Check

The Highlight Reel

Catch up on our most-read articles from previous weeks

Do you have a topic you want us to cover, a survey question you'd like us to ask, or any news you'd like to share? Let us know at [email protected].